Secrets of Saxon-Brits Killed as Danes on St Brice's Day 1002 CE
Proving that sometimes, the people you may target for a criminal assault probably don't even know what you're attacking them for because they don't have all the facts themselves.
HISTORY UNEDITED: This is the background story to the St Brices Day Genocide ordered by Saxon King husband of Queen EMMA of Normandy.
Archaeology identified remains of this female. She was disinterred fort study in Ollsjo Battleaxe Sweden. She was scientifically dated to have lived about 1770 BC. Her identity is catalogued by this number, "OLL010".
OLL being where she was buried & 010 being the consecutive number of the person they located at that general spot. She's listed in the MyTrueAncestry.com website, where you upload your DNA test file & they tell you who you match in archaeological records. Her genetic Distance to me is 13.45, which means she's from my general family group.
My paid level of subscription with MyTrueAncestry.com (MTA) allows me to create a DNA KIT using her DNA, to see who she's DNA linked to. In that KIT her closest ancient civilisation is the Saxon @ 2.47 genetic distance which is very close. MTA says:-
"Genetic distance measures how close you are to a given sample.
10 means this is your ancient ancestry
20 means this is part of your ancestral link
30 means possibly related to your ancestry.
In her KIT her three closest DNA links are the following three - which means her descendant group from Sweden are indigenous to England BEFORE the SAXONS.
) Early Anglo Saxon Cemetery West Heslerton Yorkshire 550 AD - Genetic Distance: 0.971 - I20642 Top 100 % match vs all users
) Iron Age Hill Fort Fin Cop Derbyshire England 108 BC - Genetic Distance: 1.63 - I20624 Top 100 % match vs all users
) Saxon Palace Eastry Updown Kent England 480 AD - Genetic Distance: 2.47 - EAS002 Top 100 % match vs all users.
100 % match means she's the same DNA family group, they may well be distant cousins with our lady OLL010.
History records that the Saxon, King Aethelred, decided there were far too many Danes in ENGLAND, so he ordered a ruthless massacre of anyone that the killers guessed were descendants of Danish Viking settlers.
The following are the list of St Brice's Day victims of King Aethelred who he decided were Danes but in reality were evidently more Briton than the murdering back-stabbing Saxon King Aethelred, they are part of the descendant family of our 1770 BC Sweden lady we now know as "OLL010".
Family descendants of our lady OLL010 murdered in St. Brice Massacre Oxford ENGLAND, 13 Nov 1002. Which also proves that it's unwise to make presumptions based on appearance & hearsay.
V5P (1002 AD) mtDNA Haplogroup: H1a1 Y-DNA Haplogroup: Uncertain, Deep Dive Match! 99% closer than others who share this deep dive sample.
V2P (1002 AD) mtDNA Haplogroup: H2c1 Y-DNA Haplogroup: Uncertain, Deep Dive Match! 99% closer than others who share this deep dive sample.
V1P (1002 AD) mtDNA Haplogroup: J1c3e1 Y-DNA Haplogroup: Uncertain, Deep Dive Match! 99% closer than others who share this deep dive sample.
V4P (1002 AD) mtDNA Haplogroup: H17c Y-DNA Haplogroup: Uncertain, Deep Dive Match! 99% closer than others who share this deep dive sample.
V8P (1002 AD) mtDNA Haplogroup: U4b1 Y-DNA Haplogroup: Uncertain, Deep Dive Match! 99% closer than others who share this deep dive sample.
V10P (1002 AD) mtDNA Haplogroup: U5b1b1, Deep Dive Match! 99% closer than others who share this deep dive sample.
V11P (1002 AD) mtDNA Haplogroup: H17 Y-DNA Haplogroup: Uncertain, Deep Dive Match! 99% closer than others who share this deep dive sample.
V3P (1002 AD) mtDNA Haplogroup: T2b Y-DNA Haplogroup: Uncertain, Deep Dive Match! 99% closer than others who share this deep dive sample, Genetic Distance: 7.8027
VK177 (1002 AD) mtDNA Haplogroup: H82b Y-DNA Haplogroup: R1b1a1b1a1a2b (PF6570/S28/U152) Genetic Distance: 9.9523
VK173 (1002 AD) mtDNA Haplogroup: U5a1b-a2 Y-DNA Haplogroup: I2a1b1a1a1b1a (CTS4922) Genetic Distance: 11.140
VK178 (1002 AD) mtDNA Haplogroup: K2a5 Y-DNA Haplogroup: R1b1a1b1a1a1c2b2b (S1743/Z331) Genetic Distance: 11.190
VK143 (1002 AD) mtDNA Haplogroup: U5b1b1-b Y-DNA Haplogroup: R1b1a1b1a1a1c1a2b (FGC13326) Genetic Distance: 12.116
VK150 (1002 AD) mtDNA Haplogroup: H1-a Y-DNA Haplogroup: I2a1b1a2b1a2b (S25383) Genetic Distance: 12.246
VK174 (1002 AD) mtDNA Haplogroup: H1+16239 Y-DNA Haplogroup: R1b1a1b1a1a1c2b2a1b1b1a5 (FGC17429) Genetic Distance: 12.627
V7P (1002 AD) mtDNA Haplogroup: K2a5 Y-DNA Haplogroup: Uncertain, Deep Dive Match! 99% closer than others who share this deep dive sample, Genetic Distance: 12.995
VK148 (1002 AD) mtDNA Haplogroup: H6a1a Y-DNA Haplogroup: I1 (M253) Genetic Distance: 13.979
VK172 (1002 AD) mtDNA Haplogroup: I1a1e2 Y-DNA Haplogroup: R1a1a1b1a3a1b3 (YP609) Genetic Distance: 13.993
V6P (1002 AD) mtDNA Haplogroup: H82 Y-DNA Haplogroup: Uncertain, Deep Dive Match! 99% closer than others who share this deep dive sample, Genetic Distance: 14.244
VK167 (1002 AD) mtDNA Haplogroup: H4a1a4b Y-DNA Haplogroup: I1a1a1 (S4767) Genetic Distance: 14.712
VK165 (1002 AD) mtDNA Haplogroup: U4b1b1g1 Y-DNA Haplogroup: I1a1b1a1e2a (S8175) Genetic Distance: 14.788
VK144 (1002 AD) mtDNA Haplogroup: V1a1 Y-DNA Haplogroup: I1a (DF29/S438) Genetic Distance: 15.218
V9P (1002 AD) mtDNA Haplogroup: H4a1a4b Y-DNA Haplogroup: Uncertain, Deep Dive Match! 93% closer than others who share this deep dive sample, Genetic Distance: 15.510
VK145 (1002 AD) mtDNA Haplogroup: H17 Y-DNA Haplogroup: R1a1a1b1a3a2a (CTS8401) Genetic Distance: 15.853
VK147 (1002 AD) mtDNA Haplogroup: T1a1q Y-DNA Haplogroup: R1b1a1b1a1a2a1a2 (DF17/S455) Genetic Distance: 15.976
VK176 (1002 AD) mtDNA Haplogroup: H10c Y-DNA Haplogroup: I1a1b1a1e2a (S8175) Genetic Distance: 16.671
VK175 (1002 AD) mtDNA Haplogroup: H1a1 Y-DNA Haplogroup: R1b1a1b1a1 (P310/PF6546/S129) Genetic Distance: 19.017.
So 26 indigenous English were assassinated for political point-scoring 1,000 years ago & its still ongoing this day in 2025 Australia.
With this same group, I have 20 DNA matches.
DNA Gallery Evidence SaxonBritDanes
Our Royal Family - "our" meaning all of us across this planet.
Try not to flatter yourself & fall for the trick of specialist Ancestry market their services to you, enticing you with the concept that it's rare to have royal ancestry. It'd be rare if you had no royal ancestry - in fact, I strongly suspect it's impossible.
I have a Family Tree on FamilySearch.org which admittedly is only as good as the lowest lowlife who decides to screw around with it for kicks - happens often.
However, there are many dedicated professionals & family historians correcting & adding to the record. I have many Kings & Queens in my very lengthy but still very incomplete Tree - we all have millions of ancestors, therefore we share ancestors & have many repeat ancestors. For example, many of my Great-Grandparent Kings are that status 1, 2, or 3 times which is the average.
It's of great comedic interest that in his cold geographic region, King Robert II of Scotland is listed as my Great-Grandparent 8 times, yes eight times & in the one generation.
This fellow King Donald BANE of Scotland is listed at the link as being 26th great-granduncle of UK's King Charles III, however he's listed in FamilySearch.org as my 26th great-grandfather. I don't have any TUDOR Royals in my recorded Tree.
Above image: MyTrueAncestry.com says about their chart;
"This chart is a personalized estimation of your haplogroup ancestry - e.g. your Ancient Ancestors collectively may have the haplogroups distributed as shown! The highlighted number is a percentage of the total haplogroup set. The haplogroups could be those of your distant cousins, which are not necessarily aligned with the all male/female lineage of your own haplogroups."
Blood Relic of King Louis XVI of France
French revolutionists condemned King Louis XVI to death on 21. January 1793 by means of the guillotine. Evidently, some onlookers dipped their handkerchiefs into his spilt blood.
Below image: MyTrueAncestry.com
My DNA matches one such blood relic. One of my close grandfathers was born in Paris, France. Some websites claim the relic is bogus, while others claim it isn't. I'm happy with the claim it's genuine considering my set of Royal DNA links & in reflection of my Family Tree.
YOUR FAMILY
We’re not separate tribes on this planet.
We're one tribe, scattered by the winds of time.
I so love following the twisted path that is my family tree.
I have thousands of entries in my Internet based public family tree FamilySearch.org which has been added to over the years by millions of hours of professional or freelance historians, & many half-baked charlatans.
Because my tree is so extensively large due to my proved & recent royal connections, I joined the DNA website MyTrueAncestry.com (MTA)
Not to be confused with the PAID Ancesrty.com website that blatantly steals data from the FREE FamilySearch.org website – I proved that by doing what mapmakers have done for decades, I added a secretly edited entry in FREE FamilySearch.org (FSO) that mysteriously popped up in the PAID Ancesrty.com so be informed or be conned.
Recently in my MTA DNA website result, I was to learn of my DNA link to the pictured Agnes of Antioch (1154 – c. 1184)
also known as Anna of Antioch and Anne de Châtillon, was Queen of Hungary from 1172 until 1184 as the first wife of Béla III (source Wiki)
As I have FSO Tree links to Attila the Hun who is said to be ancestor of the Arpad Dynasty, so I took to my FSO Tree to search for this female.
I found a different Agnes of Arpad from Hungry, few decades before this Agnes; and
Princess Anna of Hungry born years after; and
The Bela after Agnes’ husband, Béla IV (1206 – 3 May 1270) King of Hungary and Croatia between 1235 and 1270, and Duke of Styria from 1254 to 1258.
Also in that search I found Margaret of Hungry, whose mother-in-law (born around 1110) is Judith Von Babenberg.
If you watched the series 'Last Kingdom' Babenberg was often the sound of the title for that Uhtred of Bamburgh in Northumberland who, right or wrong, is also in my family tree around the 30th grandfather era – being one of logically 4,294,967,296 great-grandparents. (https://www.damerongeorge.com/numbers.html)
However, as there were not that many people alive for all of us to have that many great-grandparents, many of our own great-grandparents are in that status many times and why we are logically ALL related.
The fun of the family tree is finding through whom you’re related to someone in history.
Hungary & Agnes of Antioch, House of Arpad & Chatillon
Hungary & a few Medieval Nobility
Germany's cousin Ludwig van Beethoven
